January 30, 2020
Since Sunday night, when The New York Times revealed the “explosive” revelations contained in the book by former National Security Advisor, John Bolton, the news media has been blanketed with wall to wall coverage of the “Bolton bombshell.” The manuscript details a conversation between Trump and Bolton in August in which Trump admitted that he planned to withhold military aid to Ukraine until they announced investigations of the Bidens, (Source: “Trump Tied Ukraine Aid to Inquiries He Sought, Bolton Book Says,” by Maggie Haberman and Michael S. Schmidt, The New York Times, 1/26/20).
The manuscript also implicates Attorney General William Barr, Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo and Acting Chief of Staff, Mick Mulvaney. Although Bolton’s book doesn’t break any new ground, pundits have speculated that, since Bolton is the highest ranking former administration official to implicate Trump, it will ratchet up the pressure on Republican senators to allow witnesses. From Alan Dershowitz’s tortured, ahistorical argument that Trump’s conduct does not constitute an impeachable offense, to the concerned murmurs of Romney and Collins, to McConnell’s strategic admission that he lacks the votes to block witnesses, we have been reading the tea leaves in the hope that the “trial” will bear a passing resemblance to a procedure designed to reveal the truth, rather than cover it up. Continue reading “21st Century Apartheid”